Colorado Attorney Lawyer

A proposal for homosexual marriage “zero tolerance” toward the Colorado appeared for the victory Tuesday at a specific measure to certain same-sex couples the same benefits as the spouse was not married.

With 44% of votes counted envisaged, which prohibits homosexual marriage, Amendment 43 had the support of 57% against 43%, 545018 or 409932 votes. I referendum, the proposal of national partnerships, has lost 55% to 45%, or 505858 to 418752 votes.

Colorado was one of eight countries where voters to decide whether an amendment to its state constitution to ban gay marriage. Twenty states have already done so and five others, she joined Tuesday.

Jon-Paul, director of Pro-43 group Coloradans for Marriage, said he knew he would be a little less of a race because of money poured into the race of the Colorado-based software millionaire Tim Gill.

“We knew we were in the struggle for a start. But we also knew that Coloradans felt marriage between a man and woman won. We had to ensure that those who vote for him,” said Paul.

Opposite the second ballot, the longest history in Colorado, voters by an overwhelming majority a proposal to legalize possession up to a gram of marijuana, a proposal to Denver last year, voters. Amendment 44 has lost 62% of the vote against.

Furthermore, approved a ban on all gifts of $ 50 for each legislator or state employees. The experts at the National Conference of State Legislature declared the amendment 41 of Colorado are one of the harshest laws of ethics in the government of the nation.

Other profiles High-themes on the 14-state ballot papers include:

• Amendment 42, increasing Colorado’s minimum wage of $ 5.15 to $ 6.85 per hour, once a year on inflation.

• Amendment 40, the limit of the judiciary, in the Colorado Court of Appeals Colorado and the Supreme Court three or four years.

The dominant theme for many homosexuals was marriage.

Business-owner John Lindsey, 48, Glenwood Springs 43 amendment voted for the referendum and against I.

“I am not anti-gay, so to speak, but there are many ramifications, for some,” said Lindsey, a Republican, married himself described as traditionalists.

Among other things, I would referendum to adopt children as couples and require maintenance and child benefit, if they are separated. It should also ensure that its partners are medical decisions made for her and the right to inherit property, even without writing a will.

I said referendum domestic partnerships are not inadvertently, he said opponent if the same benefits provided by the spouses.

Supporters of the amendment 43 to be hoped that a new court ruling in New Jersey ordering lawmakers to approve homosexual marriages or civil unions, electoral participation. But Colorado was rockten last week by the resignation of chief Protestant Ted Haggard - a prominent Backer of the amendment - amid accusations that he paid Gay Sex.

Joshua Tafoya, 22, an important literature at Mesa State College in Grand Junction, voted against the marriage amendment and yes to the referendum on I. He said what happens in a room with someone is not his business or government.

“Personally, it would be me, and I was on my deathbed, I would like to announce, what I want, I want to intervene without the state,” said Tafoya, a single Democrat.

Gill, approximately $ 3 million on the back cover of Referendum I and the fight against Amendment 43 On the other hand, Focus on the Family, Colorado Springs evangelical Christian-based organization and its arm Public Order contributed at least $ 874000th

Consideration of State has already defined as marriage between a man and a woman, but Amendment 43 trailer said überhört be a judge and better move, a change of constitution.